Re: don't take s_umount under open_mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/23 3:35 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 20:48:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Christian has been pestering Jan and me a bit about finally fixing
>> all the pre-existing mostly theoretical cases of s_umount taken under
>> open_mutex.  This series, which is mostly from him with some help from
>> me should get us to that goal by replacing bdev_mark_dead calls that
>> can't ever reach a file system holder to call into with simple bdev
>> page invalidation.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> I've applied this so it ends up in -next now.
> @Jens, let me know if you have objections.

Looks fine to me, please add:

Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

for the series.

-- 
Jens Axboe






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux