On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:30 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:26:23PM -0500, Steve French wrote: > > For example: > > touch -h -t 02011200 testfile > > where testfile is a symlink would not change the timestamp, but > > touch -t 02011200 testfile > > does work to change the timestamp of the target > > > > Looks like some symlink inode operations are missing for other fs as well > > Do we have an xfstests for this? I was thinking the same thing - would be useful to add an xfstest for this. I actually noticed this old bug when someone reported an unrelated problem (where "find . -type l" doesn't show the symlink but "ls" and "stat" do) and the other unrelated symlink bug could be useful to add to the same test Are there other scenarios we could repro problems to an fs that doesn't have a .getattr method (like cifs.ko, afs) or .permission (like nfs and ext4)? -- Thanks, Steve
