Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:09:29 +0100
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, v9fs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cachefs@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e1351696345351cb3d168fb41c54a1ef8ccf0b16.camel@kernel.org>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's nice to see this go into common code, but why not go ahead and
> convert ceph (and possibly NFS) to use this? Is there any reason not to?

I'm converting ceph on a follow-on branch and for ceph this will be dealt with
there.

I could do NFS round about here, I suppose.

David

References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking
  - From: Jeff Layton
- [RFC PATCH 00/53] netfs, afs, cifs: Delegate high-level I/O to netfslib
  - From: David Howells
- [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: [PATCH v14 12/12] fuse: implement passthrough for readdir
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/53] netfs: Add support for DIO buffering
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/53] netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO vs buffered I/O locking
Next by thread: [RFC PATCH 13/53] netfs: Add bounce buffering support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]