On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > OK that's kind of what I imagine inode_setattr becomes, but now > that you make me look at it in that perspective, it is better to > say inode_setattr returns to a plain helper to copy values into > the inode once we move the truncate code out of there. > > It would be good to add your simple_setattr and factor it out > from fnotify_change, then. I guess this is what you plan to do > after my patchset? Exactly. Maybe we can even fold it into your patchset, but I want to see a few more if not all conversions before going ahead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
