On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:51:08AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 08:49 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 09:09:38AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 14:43 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > The handling of STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE was moved into generic_fillattr in > > > > commit 0d72b92883c6 (fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr), but > > > > we didn't account for the fact that xfs doesn't call generic_fillattr at > > > > all. > > > > > > > > Make XFS report its i_version as the STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 0d72b92883c6 (fs: pass the request_mask to generic_fillattr) > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > I had hoped to fix this in a better way with the multigrain patches, but > > > > it's taking longer than expected (if it even pans out at this point). > > > > > > > > Until then, make sure we use XFS's i_version as the STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE, > > > > even if it's bumped due to atime updates. Too many invalidations is > > > > preferable to not enough. > > > > --- > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 5 +++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c > > > > index 1c1e6171209d..2b3b05c28e9e 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c > > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c > > > > @@ -584,6 +584,11 @@ xfs_vn_getattr( > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > + if ((request_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE) && IS_I_VERSION(inode)) { > > > > + stat->change_cookie = inode_query_iversion(inode); > > > > + stat->result_mask |= STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > /* > > > > * Note: If you add another clause to set an attribute flag, please > > > > * update attributes_mask below. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > base-commit: df964ce9ef9fea10cf131bf6bad8658fde7956f6 > > > > change-id: 20230929-xfs-iversion-819fa2c18591 > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Ping? > > > > > > This patch is needed in v6.6 to prevent a regression when serving XFS > > > via NFSD. I'd prefer this go in via the xfs tree, but let me know if > > > you need me to get this merged this via a different one. > > > > Oh! Right, this is needed because the "hide a state in the high bit of > > tv_nsec" stuff got reverted in -rc3, correct? So now nfsd needs some > > way to know that something changed in the file, and better to have too > > many client invalidations than not enough? And I guess bumping > > i_version will keep nfsd sane for now? > > > > If the answers are [yes, yes, yes] then: > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Yes, yes, and yes. Can you guys shepherd this into mainline? Chandan, can you queue this (and the other xfs fixes I sent) for -rc6? --D > Thanks for the R-b! > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> >