On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 03:26, Krister Johansen <kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am curious what you have in mind in order to move this towards a > proper fix? I shied away from the approach of stealing a nlookup from > mp_fi beacuse it wasn't clear that I could always count on the nlookup > in the parent staying positive. E.g. I was afraid I was either going to > not have enough nlookups to move to submounts, or trigger a forget from > an exiting container that leads to an EBADF from the initial mount > namespace. One idea is to transfer the nlookup to a separately refcounted object that is referenced from mp_fi as well as all the submounts. Thanks, Miklos
