Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I haven't tested against w2k yet. I'll need to dig through my old MSDN
> CD stack and see if I can find a w2k CD to test with. It's no longer
> offered on current MSDN subscriptions.

Windows NT-derivatives and Windows 95-derivatives use a significantly
different code base for their filesystems, even to the extent of
having different VFAT behaviour.  Hence shortnames=win95, shortname=winnt.

The last Windows 95-derivative is Windows ME, which is was released
about the same time as Windows 2000.  Windows 2000 is an NT-derivative.

So it might be worth testing against Windows ME.

I don't know what code base is used for Windows CE.  CE is still used,
on phones, PDAs and media players among other things.  Has there been
any testing against CE - current versions and old versions?

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux