On Thu 2009-07-09 14:27:39, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > tridge@xxxxxxxxx writes: > > > Can you explain what standard you think should be applied to patent > > workaround patches for them to be acceptable? I'd like to know if > > there is the possibility of us finding some agreement in the future or > > not. > > You are talking different thing than patch. Please stop it. Uff, the patch is obviously trash -- takes working code, replaces it with known broken code -- so some justification is neccessary. Outside of U.S., the patch makes obviously no sense. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
