On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 09:52:22PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:22:39PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > I'm not leaping at the chance to reorganize my fundamental data > > structures for this. > > Yeah, understood. Thanks for taking a look at it! > > > Can we get such an escape hatch? > > Sure, please use unsafe_memcpy(), and include a comment on how the sizing > has been bounds checked, etc. Thanks, I knew there had to be one :)