... use new VFS helpers instead. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/super.c | 18 +++++++++--------- fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c index aa97754..f857eaa 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -2052,7 +2052,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) if (update_sr) { nilfs_set_last_segment(nilfs, segbuf->sb_pseg_start, segbuf->sb_sum.seg_seq, nilfs->ns_cno++); - sbi->s_super->s_dirt = 1; + mark_sb_dirty(sbi->s_super); clear_bit(NILFS_SC_HAVE_DELTA, &sci->sc_flags); clear_bit(NILFS_SC_DIRTY, &sci->sc_flags); diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c index 8e2ec43..4eb2576 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ int nilfs_commit_super(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, int dupsb) memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize); nilfs->ns_sbwtime[1] = t; } - sbi->s_super->s_dirt = 0; + mark_sb_clean(sbi->s_super); return nilfs_sync_super(sbi, dupsb); } @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void nilfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) lock_kernel(); - if (sb->s_dirt) + if (is_sb_dirty(sb)) nilfs_write_super(sb); nilfs_detach_segment_constructor(sbi); @@ -341,17 +341,17 @@ static void nilfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) * @sb: super_block * * nilfs_write_super() gets a fs-dependent lock, writes super block(s), and - * clears s_dirt. This function is called in the section protected by - * lock_super(). + * clears the superblock. This function is called in the section protected + * by lock_super(). * - * The s_dirt flag is managed by each filesystem and we protect it by ns_sem - * of the struct the_nilfs. Lock order must be as follows: + * The super block s_dirt flag is managed by each filesystem and we protect + * it by ns_sem of the struct the_nilfs. Lock order must be as follows: * * 1. lock_super() * 2. down_write(&nilfs->ns_sem) * - * Inside NILFS, locking ns_sem is enough to protect s_dirt and the buffer - * of the super block (nilfs->ns_sbp[]). + * Inside NILFS, locking ns_sem is enough to protect the super block s_dirt + * and the buffer of the super block (nilfs->ns_sbp[]). * * In most cases, VFS functions call lock_super() before calling these * methods. So we must be careful not to bring on deadlocks when using @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void nilfs_write_super(struct super_block *sb) dupsb = sbp[1] && t > nilfs->ns_sbwtime[1] + NILFS_ALTSB_FREQ; nilfs_commit_super(sbi, dupsb); } - sb->s_dirt = 0; + mark_sb_clean(sb); up_write(&nilfs->ns_sem); } diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index 8b88898..a275939 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ int load_nilfs(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi) goto failed; } if (ri.ri_need_recovery == NILFS_RECOVERY_SR_UPDATED) - sbi->s_super->s_dirt = 1; + mark_sb_dirty(sbi->s_super); } set_nilfs_loaded(nilfs); -- 1.6.0.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html