On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 01:59:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 06:46:03AM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: > > > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c > > > index 0eac04507904..e2432c327599 100644 > > > --- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c > > > +++ b/fs/gfs2/inode.c > > > @@ -1868,14 +1868,16 @@ int gfs2_permission(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *inode, > > > { > > > struct gfs2_inode *ip; > > > struct gfs2_holder i_gh; > > > + struct gfs2_glock *gl; > > > int error; > > > gfs2_holder_mark_uninitialized(&i_gh); > > > ip = GFS2_I(inode); > > > - if (gfs2_glock_is_locked_by_me(ip->i_gl) == NULL) { > > > + gl = rcu_dereference(ip->i_gl); > > > + if (!gl || gfs2_glock_is_locked_by_me(gl) == NULL) { > > > > This looks wrong. It should be if (gl && ... otherwise the > > gfs2_glock_nq_init will dereference the null pointer. > > We shouldn't observe NULL ->i_gl unless we are in RCU mode, > which means we'll bail out without reaching gfs2_glock_nq_init()... Something like if (unlikely(!gl)) { /* inode is getting torn down, must be RCU mode */ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)); return -ECHILD; } might be less confusing way to express that...