Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jan and Martin,

As promised, I have continued to investigate what is happening with
Win98, even though I don't think it is a high priority.

I've discovered two things that are interesting:

  1) the 11 spaces varient works pretty nicely with it

  2) the current dualnames patch works nicely if you change the first
  byte to a '~' instead of a space.

What seems to be happening is that Win98 either wants all spaces, or
it wants to see a '~' in the 8 byte prefix, after taking into account
nul termination. If it doesn't see this '~' then it doesn't even look
for a long name.

Cheers, Tridge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux