Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 11:03:47 -0700
Cc: bodonnel@xxxxxxxxxx, geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzbot+1fa947e7f09e136925b8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230930172129.GA21298@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Sat, 30 Sept 2023 at 10:21, Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Doh, wrong repo.  I'm kinda surprised that git request-pull didn't
> complain about that.

I suspect it did complain, but that one-liner is admittedly much too
easy to overlook when everything else looks sane.

> Will send a new one.

Thanks, pulled.

             Linus

References:
- [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 11/20] arm64: enable ARCH_HAS_PKEYS on arm64
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [xfs?] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in xfs_attr3_leaf_add_work
Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4
Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: bug fixes for 6.6-rc4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux