Re: [rfc][patch 4/4] fs: tmpfs, ext2 use new truncate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:22:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> OK fair enough. But I don't know if all those checks are
> realy appropriate. For example an IS_APPEND inode should
> be able to have its blocks trimmed off if a write fails.

It should.  But I think that's a separate issue of what we're trying to
fix right now.  So let's just do the method reshuffle now and then sort
out the checks later.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux