On Fri 2009-07-03 09:59:35, tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > > That's why we have ethernet checksums. > > which of course just changes the number of bits. The argument remains > the same. Ok, so what is your estimate of XP crash probability? > > It already _was_ perfect before you started patching it. > > wow, I really didn't expect the objection to my patch to be that VFAT > is perfect! But ... it was, and there is still possibility of just using position in directory to avoid collisions completely. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
