Re: [PATCH 02/10] writeback: switch to per-bdi threads for flushing data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(bdi, tmp, &bdi_list, bdi_list) {
+			if (bdi->task || !bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi))
+				continue;
+
+			bdi_add_default_flusher_task(bdi);
+		}
+
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+
What happens if we are preempted here? Since we have TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state, we will not come back unless some other task wakes us up. Who
would wake us up in this case?
If it's preempted (CONFIG_PREEMPT=y), it will stay in runqueue. Only when
it calls schedule initiatively or calls schedule when exiting to user space,
it will be moved out of runqueue if its state isn't TASK_RUNNING.

See flag PREEMPT_ACTIVE.

OK, thanks for the hint!

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux