Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/07/2009 02:25 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> I wish the lawyers people would come forward, as promised,,and explain what
>> are the constraints on the short_name, given a long_name is present.
>> I'm still waiting for that private mail in my e-box. If the names do not
>> correspond at all but are both valid, why is that a problem?
> 
> To be fair Tridge said there is a reason.
> 
> The only problem is we don't know what it is...
> 

He also said someone will answer this in a private e-mail, I'm still
waiting.

> -- Jamie

Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux