Re: [RFC 03/23] filemap: add folio with at least mapping_min_order in __filemap_get_folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-09-15 21:00, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:38:28PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
>> @@ -1862,6 +1862,10 @@ struct folio *__filemap_get_folio(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
>>  		fgf_t fgp_flags, gfp_t gfp)
>>  {
>>  	struct folio *folio;
>> +	int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
>> +	int nr_of_pages = (1U << min_order);
>> +
>> +	index = round_down(index, nr_of_pages);
>>  
>>  repeat:
>>  	folio = filemap_get_entry(mapping, index);
>> @@ -1929,8 +1933,14 @@ struct folio *__filemap_get_folio(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
>>  			err = -ENOMEM;
>>  			if (order == 1)
>>  				order = 0;
>> +			if (order < min_order)
>> +				order = min_order;
> 
> ... oh, you do something similar here to what I recommend in my previous
> response.  I don't understand why you need the previous patch.
> 

Hmm, we made changes here a bit later and that is why it is a duplicated
I guess in both iomap fgf order and clamping the order here to min_order. We could
remove the previous patch and retain this one here.

>> +			if (min_order)
>> +				VM_BUG_ON(index & ((1UL << order) - 1));
> 
> You don't need the 'if' here; index & ((1 << 0) - 1) becomes false.
> 

Sounds good!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux