Re: [PATCH] fs/posix_acl: apply umask if superblock disables ACL support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:10 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Have you verified that commit ac6800e279a2 ("fs: Add missing umask strip
> in vfs_tmpfile") doesn't already fix this?

No, I havn't - I submitted this patch already several years ago, but
it was never merged, and since then, I've been carrying this patch
around in all kernels I ever used. While doing some other kernel work
this week, I decided to resubmit it, because I thought it's a security
vulnerability to ignore the umask. But thanks, it's a good hint, I'll
check that 2022 commit.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux