Re: inotify maintenance status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:01 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We do not add new system calls for doing something that is already
> possible with existing system calls to make the life of a programmer
> easier - this has never been a valid argument for adding a new syscall.

- it's not possible to safely add an inotify watch; this isn't about
making something easier, but about making something
safe/reliable/race-free in a way that wasn't possible before
- there are many precedents of new system calls just to add dfd
support (fchmodat, execveat, linkat, mkdirat, ....)
- there are also a few new system calls that were added to make the
life of a programmer easier even though the same was already possible
with existing system calls (close_range, process_madvise, pidfd_getfd,
mount_setattr, ...)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux