On 18/09/2023 18:52, David Sterba wrote: > [...] > Let's stick to temp-fsid for now, I like that it says the fsid is > temporary, virtual could be potentially stored permanently (like another > metadata_uuid). > > I've added the patch to for-next, with some fixups, mostly stylistic. > I'll add the btrfs-progs part soon so we have the support for testing. > The feature seems to be complete regarding the original idea, if you > have any updates please send them separate patches or replies to this > thread. Thanks. > Thanks a bunch David, much appreciated! BTW, thanks a lot all reviewers, was a great and productive discussion. For testing, likely you're aware but I think doesn't harm to mention here as well: there's a fstests case for this feature here -> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20230913224545.3940971-1-gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx/ Cheers, Guilherme
