[PATCH v4 09/10] fuse: Use the existing inode fuse_cache_write_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



makes the code slightly smaller, I guess the compiler would havve
optimized that out already.
The other is file_inode(file), but I'm not sure if there is
any risk that they might differ.

Cc: Hao Xu <howeyxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dharmendra Singh <dsingh@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index a996368cd38b..23fd1c4a1de7 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_cache_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 
 	if (fc->writeback_cache && !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT)) {
 		/* Update size (EOF optimization) and mode (SUID clearing) */
-		err = fuse_update_attributes(mapping->host, file,
+		err = fuse_update_attributes(inode, file,
 					     STATX_SIZE | STATX_MODE);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
-- 
2.39.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux