Re: [PATCH 0/6] shmem: high order folios support in write path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.09.23 17:34, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:29:51PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 15.09.23 11:51, Daniel Gomez wrote:
This series add support for high order folios in shmem write
path.
There are at least 2 cases/topics to handle that I'd appreciate
feedback.
1. With the new strategy, you might end up with a folio order matching
HPAGE_PMD_ORDER. However, we won't respect the 'huge' flag anymore if
THP is enabled.
2. When the above (1.) occurs, the code skips the huge path, so
xa_find with hindex is skipped.

Similar to large anon folios (but different to large non-shmem folios in the
pagecache), this can result in memory waste.

No, it can't.  This patchset triggers only on write, not on read or page
fault, and it's conservative, so it will only allocate folios which are
entirely covered by the write.  IOW this is memory we must allocate in
order to satisfy the write; we're just allocating it in larger chunks
when we can.

Oh, good! I was assuming you would eventually over-allocate on the write path.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux