Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 2009-07-03 03:59, tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > The cam does not have a problem with long filenames 牴 
>
>That is curious. When you use a long filename (ie. a real long
>filename, not a mixed case 8.3 name), if you ask the camera for
>details on the photo,

No-no, as previously mentioned it ignores filenames not in the
format of dscf????.jpg. But if I interpret the hexdump right,
standard Linux creates a long name *anyway*, even for names
fitting in 8.3, if it's lowercase:

│00bce510 79 39 79 39 03 00 f5 5b-79 39 95 4b 00 00 00 00 |y9y9? ?[y9?K    |    
│00bce520 41 67 00 6f 00 64 00 64-00 61 00 0f 00 27 6d 00 |Ag o d d a ? 'm |    
│00bce530 6e 00 2e 00 7a 00 69 00-70 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff |n . z i p     ??|    
│00bce540 47 4f 44 44 41 4d 4e 20-5a 49 50 20 00 64 d2 20 |GODDAMN ZIP  d? |    
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux