Re: [PATCH 1/3] proc/vmcore: Do not map unaccepted memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:42:51AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.09.23 10:41, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:03:36AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 06.09.23 09:39, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > > Support for unaccepted memory was added recently, refer commit
> > > > dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory"), whereby
> > > > a virtual machine may need to accept memory before it can be used.
> > > > 
> > > > Do not map unaccepted memory because it can cause the guest to fail.
> > > > 
> > > > For /proc/vmcore, which is read-only, this means a read or mmap of
> > > > unaccepted memory will return zeros.
> > > 
> > > Does a second (kdump) kernel that exposes /proc/vmcore reliably get access
> > > to the information whether memory of the first kernel is unaccepted (IOW,
> > > not its memory, but the memory of the first kernel it is supposed to expose
> > > via /proc/vmcore)?
> > 
> > There are few patches in my queue to few related issue, but generally,
> > yes, the information is available to the target kernel via EFI
> > configuration table.
> 
> I assume that table provided by the first kernel, and not read directly from
> HW, correct?

The table is constructed by the EFI stub in the first kernel based on EFI
memory map.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux