> But in the kernel code, pr_fname is copied from ->comm, they should > be equal, shouldn't they? The point is that we are not at liberty to change the size of pr_fname. Its size and layout are known to userland and thus set in stone. To have a larger size, we would have to invent a new NT_* type code with a new layout that would also be known to userland. It's not worth the bother. Nowadays a debugger can see AT_EXECFN in auxv (NT_AUXV in core files, /proc/pid/auxv live), and look at that address in the user memory (core file or process). That's clobberable on the user-mode stack, but it can be of unbounded size. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html