Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 05:59:03PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> file_remove_privs might call into notify_change(), which
> requires to hold an exclusive lock.

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

FYI, I'd be really curious about benchmarking this against you version
that checks xattrs for shared locked writes on files that have xattrs
but not security ones or setuid bits.  On the one hand being able to
do the shared lock sounds nice, on the other hand even just looking up
the xattrs will probably make it slower at least for smaller I/O.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux