On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 05:23:42PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > > On 9/6/23 17:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > > > @@ -842,6 +842,16 @@ static inline void inode_lock_shared_nested(struct inode *inode, unsigned subcla > > > down_read_nested(&inode->i_rwsem, subclass); > > > } > > > +static inline void inode_assert_locked(struct inode *inode) > > > +{ > > > + lockdep_assert_held(&inode->i_rwsem); > > > +} > > > + > > > +static inline void inode_assert_write_locked(struct inode *inode) > > > +{ > > > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&inode->i_rwsem); > > > +} > > > > This mirrors what we have in mm, but it's only going to trigger on > > builds that have lockdep enabled. Lockdep is very expensive; it > > easily doubles the time it takes to run xfstests on my laptop, so > > I don't generally enable it. So what we also have in MM is: > > > > static inline void mmap_assert_write_locked(struct mm_struct *mm) > > { > > lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_lock); > > VM_BUG_ON_MM(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_lock), mm); > > } > > > > Now if you have lockdep enabled, you get the lockdep check which > > gives you all the lovely lockdep information, but if you don't, you > > at least get the cheap check that someone is holding the lock at all. > > > > ie I would make this: > > > > +static inline void inode_assert_write_locked(struct inode *inode) > > +{ > > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&inode->i_rwsem); > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!inode_is_locked(inode)); > > +} > > > > Maybe the locking people could give us a rwsem_is_write_locked() > > predicate, but until then, this is the best solution we came up with. > > > Which is exactly what I had suggested in the other thread :) Or hoist the XFS mrlock, because it actually /does/ know if the rwsem is held in shared or exclusive mode. --D