On 05/09/2023 13:50, David Sterba wrote: > [...] > I'd like to pick this as a feature for 6.7, it's extending code we > already have for metadata_uuid so this is a low risk feature. The only > problem I see for now is the name, using the word 'single'. > > We have single as a block group profile name and a filesystem can exist > on a single device too, this is would be confusing when referring to it. > Single-dev can be a working name but for a final release we should > really try to pick something more unique. I don't have a suggestion for > now. > > The plan for now is that I'll add the patch to a topic branch and add it > to for-next so it could be tested but there might be some updates still > needed. Either as changes to this patch or as separate patches, that > depends. > Hi David, thanks for your feedback! I agree with you that this name is a bit confusing, we can easily change that! How about virtual-fsid? I confess I'm not the best (by far!) to name stuff, so I'll be glad to follow a suggestion from anyone here heheh I also agree we could have this merged in your -next tree, and once a new (good) name is proposed, I can re-submit with that and you'd replace the patch in your tree, if that makes sense to you. Of course an extra patch changing the name is also valid, if it's your preference. Cheers, Guilherme
