Re: [syzbot] [xfs?] INFO: task hung in __fdget_pos (4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:23:33AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > Which is pretty much the case for all filesystem bug reports from
> 
> I think we should at least consider the option of reducing the number of
> filesystems syzbot tests. Filesystems that are orphaned or that have no
> active maintainers for a long period of time just produce noise.

I wish you good luck in convincing the syzbot maintainers that
testing obsolete, unmaintained and/or deprecated code should be
outside the scope of what syzbot exercises...

> Slapping tags such as [ntfs3?] or [reiserfs?] really don't help to
> reduce the noise.

Yup - they can't be trusted to be correct, so it does nothing to
reduce the noise. There's been two false XFS categorisations
in just the last half a day....

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux