tridge@xxxxxxxxx writes: > > I have no objection to take this patch for the -stable releases when it > > goes into Linus's tree. Just forward the git commit ids to > > stable@xxxxxxxxxx and I can take care of it. > > ok, thanks Greg. > > Hirofumi-san tells me we've missed the merge window for 2.6.31, so it > seems that this will go first into the fatfs tree, then go into > Linus's tree via -next for 2.6.32. So hopefully the patch will get > some more testing (perhaps in -mm?) before it needs to be considered > for -stable. Yes. And I will not drop this patch even if it's not perfect on test. I can understand it would not be the option for some users. The default may be arguable though, like I said at first. My choice is to provide the option of those to users. > Meanwhile some of the distros and other vendors might decide to apply > it sooner depending on their level of legal concern. Yes, it's good. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
