Re: [PATCH 2/6] fuse: Create helper function if DIO write needs exclusive lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 14:13, Bernd Schubert <aakef@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/30/23 12:57, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 18:11, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is just a preparation to avoid code duplication in the next
> >> commit.
> >>
> >> Cc: Hao Xu <howeyxu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Dharmendra Singh <dsingh@xxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   fs/fuse/file.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> >> index b1b9f2b9a37d..6b8b9512c336 100644
> >> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> >> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> >> @@ -1298,6 +1298,37 @@ static ssize_t fuse_perform_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *ii)
> >>          return res;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +static bool fuse_io_past_eof(struct kiocb *iocb,
> >> +                                              struct iov_iter *iter)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> >> +
> >> +       return iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(iter) > i_size_read(inode);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * @return true if an exclusive lock direct IO writes is needed
> >> + */
> >> +static bool fuse_dio_wr_exclusive_lock(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> >> +       struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
> >> +
> >> +       /* server side has to advise that it supports parallel dio writes */
> >> +       if (!(ff->open_flags & FOPEN_PARALLEL_DIRECT_WRITES))
> >> +               return false;
> >
> > You got the return values the wrong way around.  I can fix this, no
> > need to resend.
>
> Ooops, sorry! Do you mind to take this series for next merge round? I
> obviously didn't test the latest series yet and I would like to first
> test performance and do several rounds of xfs tests. That should be done
> by Monday, but might be a bit late for 6.6

Right, this should aim for 6.7.

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux