On Thu 24-08-23 08:11:42, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:48:39PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Convert xfs to use bdev_open_by_path() and pass the handle around.
> ....
>
> > @@ -426,15 +427,15 @@ xfs_shutdown_devices(
> > * race, everyone loses.
> > */
> > if (mp->m_logdev_targp && mp->m_logdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp) {
> > - blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > - invalidate_bdev(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > + blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> > + invalidate_bdev(mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> > }
> > if (mp->m_rtdev_targp) {
> > - blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > - invalidate_bdev(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > + blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> > + invalidate_bdev(mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> > }
> > - blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > - invalidate_bdev(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
> > + blkdev_issue_flush(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> > + invalidate_bdev(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev_handle->bdev);
> > }
>
> Why do these need to be converted to run through bt_bdev_handle? If
> the buftarg is present and we've assigned targp->bt_bdev_handle
> during the call to xfs_alloc_buftarg(), then we've assigned
> targp->bt_bdev from the handle at the same time, yes?
Good point, these conversions are pointless now so I've removed them. They
are leftover from a previous version based on a kernel where xfs was
dropping bdev references in a different place. Thanks for noticing.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
