Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Supporting same fsid mounting through a compat_ro feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/08/2023 12:43, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Hi all, this is the 2nd attempt of supporting same fsid mounting
> on btrfs. V1 is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20230504170708.787361-1-gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> The mechanism used to achieve that in V2 was a mix between the suggestion
> from JohnS (spoofed fsid) and Qu (a single-dev compat_ro flag) - it is
> still based in the metadata_uuid feature, leveraging that infrastructure
> since it prevents lots of corner cases, like sysfs same-fsid crashes.
> 
> The patches are based on kernel v6.5-rc3 with Anand's metadata_uuid refactor
> part 2 on top of it [0]; the btrfs-progs patch is based on "v6.3.3".
> 
> Comments/suggestions and overall feedback is much appreciated - tnx in advance!
> Cheers,
> 
> Guilherme
> 
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1690792823.git.anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 
> Guilherme G. Piccoli (3):
>   btrfs-progs: Add the single-dev feature (to both mkfs/tune)
>   btrfs: Introduce the single-dev feature
>   btrfs: Add parameter to force devices behave as single-dev ones


Hi David, friendly ping about this one - do you think we could have it
merged, or do you have suggestions to improve it maybe?

Thanks in advance and apologies for the ping!
Cheers,


Guilherme





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux