On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 4:25 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8/11/23 03:52, Nitesh Shetty wrote: > > + schedule_work(&emulation_io->emulation_work); > > schedule_work() uses system_wq. This won't work for all users since > there are no latency guarantees for system_wq. > At present copy is treated as background operation, so went ahead with the current approach. Thank you, Nitesh Shetty