Re: [PATCH v1] proc/ksm: add ksm stats to /proc/pid/smaps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 08.08.23 19:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue,  8 Aug 2023 10:08:58 -0700 Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> With madvise and prctl KSM can be enabled for different VMA's. Once it
>>> is enabled we can query how effective KSM is overall. However we cannot
>>> easily query if an individual VMA benefits from KSM.
>>>
>>> This commit adds a KSM section to the /prod/<pid>/smaps file. It reports
>>> how many of the pages are KSM pages.
>>>
>>> Here is a typical output:
>>>
>>> 7f420a000000-7f421a000000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
>>> Size:             262144 kB
>>> KernelPageSize:        4 kB
>>> MMUPageSize:           4 kB
>>> Rss:               51212 kB
>>> Pss:                8276 kB
>>> Shared_Clean:        172 kB
>>> Shared_Dirty:      42996 kB
>>> Private_Clean:       196 kB
>>> Private_Dirty:      7848 kB
>>> Referenced:        15388 kB
>>> Anonymous:         51212 kB
>>> KSM:               41376 kB
>>> LazyFree:              0 kB
>>> AnonHugePages:         0 kB
>>> ShmemPmdMapped:        0 kB
>>> FilePmdMapped:         0 kB
>>> Shared_Hugetlb:        0 kB
>>> Private_Hugetlb:       0 kB
>>> Swap:             202016 kB
>>> SwapPss:            3882 kB
>>> Locked:                0 kB
>>> THPeligible:    0
>>> ProtectionKey:         0
>>> ksm_state:          0
>>> ksm_skip_base:      0
>>> ksm_skip_count:     0
>>> VmFlags: rd wr mr mw me nr mg anon
>>>
>>> This information also helps with the following workflow:
>>> - First enable KSM for all the VMA's of a process with prctl.
>>> - Then analyze with the above smaps report which VMA's benefit the most
>>> - Change the application (if possible) to add the corresponding madvise
>>> calls for the VMA's that benefit the most
>> smaps is documented in Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst, please.
>> (And it looks a bit out of date).
>> Did you consider adding this info to smaps_rollup as well?
>
> It would be great to resend that patch to linux-mm + kernel. Otherwise I'll have
> to do some digging / downloading from linux-fsdevel ;)

I'll cc linux-mm + kernel on the next version.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux