Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7]ext4: Add EXT4_IOC_ADD_GLOBAL_ALLOC_RULE restricts block allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 23, 2009  20:02 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Andreas Dilger<adilger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Jun 23, 2009  17:25 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote:
> >> alloc_flag of ext4_alloc_rule structure is set as "mandatory" or "advisory".
> >> Restricted blocks with "mandatory" are never used by block allocator.
> >> But in "advisory" case, block allocator is allowed to use restricted blocks
> >> when there are no free blocks on FS.
> >
> > Would it make more sense to implement the range protections via the
> > existing preallocation ranges (PA)?  An inode can have multiple
> > PAs attached to it to have it prefer allocations from that range.
> >
> > We could also attach PAs to the superblock to prevent other files from
> > allocating out of those ranges.  This would work better with the existing
> > allocation code instead of creating a second similar mechanism.
> 
> Where can I find documentation about how PA works?  Or is it just in
> the source?  If so, what are one or two calls that cause the PA ranges
> to be set, etc.

Aneesh is the expert on the preallocation code.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux