Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That said, I do _not_ like the notion of > > > Add a new inode->i_filesystem_fop pointer > > regardless of whether it's in inode->i_op or wherever. I think we should > just handle this in the regular "inode->f_op->open" routine, the same way > we handle FMODE_EXCLUSIVE (O_EXCL), FMODE_NDELAY (O_NONBLOCK) and lack of > access rights (O_NOACCESS) in the driver open routines that currently > handle those specially (O_NDELAY is spe Did you accidentally delete more than the word 'special' there? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
