Re: [PATCH 05/13] xfs: don't call invalidate_bdev in xfs_free_buftarg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:15:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> XFS never uses the block device mapping, so there is no point in calling
> invalidate_bdev which invalidates said mapping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

This is a revert of commit 032e160305f68 ("xfs: invalidate block device
page cache during unmount").  How do you propose dealing with the block
device mapping being incoherent due to unmount write races so you don't
re-break my test system?

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 15d1e5a7c2d340..83b8702030f71d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1944,7 +1944,6 @@ xfs_free_buftarg(
>  	list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru);
>  
>  	blkdev_issue_flush(btp->bt_bdev);
> -	invalidate_bdev(btp->bt_bdev);
>  	fs_put_dax(btp->bt_daxdev, btp->bt_mount);
>  
>  	kmem_free(btp);
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux