Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: introduce atomic open

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 15:28, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Dharmendra Singh <dsingh@xxxxxxx>
>
> This adds full atomic open support, to avoid lookup before open/create.
> If the implementation (fuse server/daemon) does not support atomic open
> it falls back to non-atomic open.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dharmendra Singh <dsingh@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dir.c             | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h          |   3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/fuse.h |   3 +
>  3 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> index 6ffc573de470..8145bbfc7a40 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static int _fuse_create_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry,
>
>  static int fuse_mknod(struct mnt_idmap *, struct inode *, struct dentry *,
>                       umode_t, dev_t);
> -static int fuse_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry,
> +static int fuse_create_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry,
>                             struct file *file, unsigned flags,
>                             umode_t mode)
>  {
> @@ -770,6 +770,174 @@ static int fuse_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry,
>         return finish_no_open(file, res);
>  }
>
> +static int _fuse_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry,
> +                           struct file *file, unsigned flags,
> +                           umode_t mode)
> +{
> +
> +       int err;
> +       struct inode *inode;
> +       struct fuse_mount *fm = get_fuse_mount(dir);
> +       struct fuse_conn *fc = fm->fc;
> +       FUSE_ARGS(args);
> +       struct fuse_forget_link *forget;
> +       struct fuse_create_in inarg;
> +       struct fuse_open_out outopen;
> +       struct fuse_entry_out outentry;
> +       struct fuse_inode *fi;
> +       struct fuse_file *ff;
> +       struct dentry *res = NULL;
> +
> +       /* Userspace expects S_IFREG in create mode */
> +       if ((flags & O_CREAT) && (mode & S_IFMT) != S_IFREG) {
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               err = -EINVAL;
> +               goto out_err;
> +       }
> +       forget = fuse_alloc_forget();
> +       err = -ENOMEM;
> +       if (!forget)
> +               goto out_err;
> +
> +       err = -ENOMEM;
> +       ff = fuse_file_alloc(fm);
> +       if (!ff)
> +               goto out_put_forget_req;
> +
> +       if (!fc->dont_mask)
> +               mode &= ~current_umask();
> +
> +       flags &= ~O_NOCTTY;
> +       memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
> +       memset(&outentry, 0, sizeof(outentry));
> +       inarg.flags = flags;
> +       inarg.mode = mode;
> +       inarg.umask = current_umask();
> +
> +       if (fc->handle_killpriv_v2 && (flags & O_TRUNC) &&
> +           !(flags & O_EXCL) && !capable(CAP_FSETID)) {
> +               inarg.open_flags |= FUSE_OPEN_KILL_SUIDGID;
> +       }
> +
> +       args.opcode = FUSE_OPEN_ATOMIC;
> +       args.nodeid = get_node_id(dir);
> +       args.in_numargs = 2;
> +       args.in_args[0].size = sizeof(inarg);
> +       args.in_args[0].value = &inarg;
> +       args.in_args[1].size = entry->d_name.len + 1;
> +       args.in_args[1].value = entry->d_name.name;
> +       args.out_numargs = 2;
> +       args.out_args[0].size = sizeof(outentry);
> +       args.out_args[0].value = &outentry;
> +       args.out_args[1].size = sizeof(outopen);
> +       args.out_args[1].value = &outopen;
> +
> +       if (flags & O_CREAT) {
> +               err = get_create_ext(&args, dir, entry, mode);
> +               if (err)
> +                       goto out_free_ff;
> +       }
> +
> +       err = fuse_simple_request(fm, &args);

free_ext_value() missing.

Which also begs the question: can't _fuse_create_open() and
_fuse_atomic_open() be consolidated into a common helper?  There's
just too much duplication between them to warrant completely separate
implementations.

> +       if (err == -ENOSYS) {
> +               fc->no_open_atomic = 1;
> +               fuse_file_free(ff);
> +               kfree(forget);
> +               goto fallback;
> +       }
> +       if (err) {
> +               if (err == -ENOENT)
> +                       fuse_invalidate_entry_cache(entry);
> +               goto out_free_ff;
> +       }
> +
> +       err = -EIO;
> +       if (invalid_nodeid(outentry.nodeid) || fuse_invalid_attr(&outentry.attr))
> +               goto out_free_ff;
> +
> +       ff->fh = outopen.fh;
> +       ff->nodeid = outentry.nodeid;
> +       ff->open_flags = outopen.open_flags;
> +       inode = fuse_iget(dir->i_sb, outentry.nodeid, outentry.generation,
> +                         &outentry.attr, entry_attr_timeout(&outentry), 0);
> +       if (!inode) {
> +               flags &= ~(O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_TRUNC);
> +               fuse_sync_release(NULL, ff, flags);
> +               fuse_queue_forget(fm->fc, forget, outentry.nodeid, 1);
> +               err = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto out_err;
> +       }
> +       if (d_in_lookup(entry)) {
> +               res = d_splice_alias(inode, entry);
> +               if (res) {
> +                       if (IS_ERR(res)) {
> +                               /*
> +                                * Close the file in user space, but do not unlink it,
> +                                * if it was created - with network file systems other
> +                                * clients might have already accessed it.
> +                                */
> +                               fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +                               fuse_sync_release(fi, ff, flags);
> +                               fuse_queue_forget(fm->fc, forget, outentry.nodeid, 1);
> +                               err = PTR_ERR(res);
> +                               goto out_err;
> +                       }
> +                       entry = res;
> +               }
> +       } else
> +               d_instantiate(entry, inode);
> +       fuse_change_entry_timeout(entry, &outentry);
> +
> +       if (outopen.open_flags & FOPEN_FILE_CREATED) {
> +               if (!(flags & O_CREAT)) {
> +                       pr_debug("Server side bug, FOPEN_FILE_CREATED set "
> +                                "without O_CREAT, ignoring.");
> +               } else {
> +                       /* This should be always set when the file is created */
> +                       fuse_dir_changed(dir);
> +                       file->f_mode |= FMODE_CREATED;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!(flags & O_CREAT))
> +               fuse_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);

We advise to use readdirplus from lookup, because readdirplus can
substitute for a lookup.  But readdirplus cannot substitute for the
atomic open, so it's not a good idea to advise using readdirpuls in
this case.  At least that's how I see this.

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux