Re: [PATCH 0/2] Supporting same fsid filesystems mounting on btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Supporting same fsid filesystems mounting on btrfs
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 12:47:31 -0300
Cc: clm@xxxxxx, josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dsterba@xxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, vivek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ludovico.denittis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, johns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nborisov@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230504170708.787361-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0

On 04/05/2023 14:07, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> [...]

Hi folks, V2 sent here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20230803154453.1488248-1-gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,


Guilherme

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Supporting same fsid filesystems mounting on btrfs
  - From: Guilherme G. Piccoli

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] file: always lock position
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6] vfs, security: Fix automount superblock LSM init problem, preventing NFS sb sharing
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Supporting same fsid filesystems mounting on btrfs
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 0/4] Landlock: ioctl support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux