[PATCH] fs: compare truncated timestamps in current_mgtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



current_mgtime compares the ctime (which has already been truncated) to
the value from ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64 (which has not). All of the
existing filesystems that enable mgtime have 1ns granularity, so this is
not a problem today, but it is more correct to compare truncated
timestamps instead.

Do the truncate earlier, so we're comparing like things.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/inode.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 369621e7faf5..8199d0e02cce 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -2097,28 +2097,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_remove_privs);
  */
 static struct timespec64 current_mgtime(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	struct timespec64 now;
+	struct timespec64 now, ctime;
 	atomic_long_t *pnsec = (atomic_long_t *)&inode->__i_ctime.tv_nsec;
 	long nsec = atomic_long_read(pnsec);
 
 	if (nsec & I_CTIME_QUERIED) {
 		ktime_get_real_ts64(&now);
-	} else {
-		struct timespec64 ctime;
+		return timestamp_truncate(now, inode);
+	}
 
-		ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now);
+	ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64(&now);
+	now = timestamp_truncate(now, inode);
 
-		/*
-		 * If we've recently fetched a fine-grained timestamp
-		 * then the coarse-grained one may still be earlier than the
-		 * existing one. Just keep the existing ctime if so.
-		 */
-		ctime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
-		if (timespec64_compare(&ctime, &now) > 0)
-			now = ctime;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * If we've recently fetched a fine-grained timestamp
+	 * then the coarse-grained one may still be earlier than the
+	 * existing ctime. Just keep the existing value if so.
+	 */
+	ctime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
+	if (timespec64_compare(&ctime, &now) > 0)
+		now = ctime;
 
-	return timestamp_truncate(now, inode);
+	return now;
 }
 
 /**

---
base-commit: 4ce0966ed7c04881c5f352e0bb53af9b38f94253
change-id: 20230728-mgctime-5e0ec0e89b04

Best regards,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux