On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:58:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:21:35AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > The sections tested for are: > > > > xfs_crc > > xfs_reflink > > xfs_reflink-normapbt > > xfs_reflink_1024 > > xfs_reflink_2k > > xfs_reflink_4k > > xfs_nocrc > > xfs_nocrc_512 > > xfs_nocrc_1k > > xfs_nocrc_2k > > xfs_nocrc_4k > > xfs_logdev > > xfs_rtdev > > xfs_rtlogdev > > Question: Have you turned on gcov to determine how much of fs/xfs/ and > fs/iomap/ are actually getting exercised by these configurations? Not yet, and it would somehow have to be the aggregate sum of the different guests, is that easy to sum up these days, given the same kernel is used? > I have for my fstests fleet; it's about ~90% for iomap, ~87% for > xfs/libxfs, ~84% for the pagecache, and ~80% for xfs/scrub. Was > wondering what everyone else got on the test. Neat, it's something we could automate provided if you already have a way to sum this up, dump it somehwere and we I can make a set of ansible tasks to do it. Luis
