On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> In order to remove the end element from the ctl_table struct arrays, we
> replace the register_syctl function with a macro that will add the
> ARRAY_SIZE to the new register_sysctl_sz function. In this way the
> callers that are already using an array of ctl_table structs do not have
> to change. We *do* change the callers that pass the ctl_table array as a
> pointer.
Thanks for doing this and this series!
> Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h
> index 0495c858989f..b1168ae281c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
> @@ -215,6 +215,9 @@ struct ctl_path {
> const char *procname;
> };
>
> +#define register_sysctl(path, table) \
> + register_sysctl_sz(path, table, ARRAY_SIZE(table))
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
Wasn't it Greg who had suggested this? Maybe add Suggested-by with him
on it.
Also, your cover letter and first few patches are not CC'd to the netdev
list or others. What you want to do is collect all the email addresses
for this small patch series and add them to who you email for your
entire series, otherwise at times they won't be able to properly review
or understand the exact context of the changes. You want folks to do less
work to review, not more.
So please resend and add others to the other patches.
Luis
