Re: [PATCH] fs: open the block device after allocation the super_block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:51:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > I've removed the references to bind mounts from the commit message.
> > I mentioned in [1] and [2] that this problem is really related to
> > superblocks at it's core. It's just that technically a bind-mount would
> > be created in the following scenario where two processes race to create
> > a superblock:
> 
> I wanted to keep some of Jan's original logic.  In the end a bind mount
> is just one of many reuses of a super block so I think your updated
> log is fine.
> 
> Btw, it might make sense to place this on a separate branch, and Jan's
> block work will have to pull it in, and it might be good to not
> require the entire vfs misc tree to be pult in.

Ok, now on the vfs.super branch.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux