Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] Revert "tcp: Use per-vma locking for receive zerocopy"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:49:16PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:34 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 08:02:12PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 1:21 PM Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
> > > <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This reverts commit 7a7f094635349a7d0314364ad50bdeb770b6df4f.
> > >
> > > nit: some explanation and SOB would be nice.
> >
> > Well, it can't be actually applied.  What needs to happen is that the
> > networking people need to drop the commit from their tree.  Some review
> > from the networking people would be helpful to be sure that I didn't
> > break anything in my reworking of this patch to apply after my patches.
> 
> Are you saying you want them to revert it before it reaches mainline?
> That commit landed in v6.5-rc1.

... what?  It was posted on June 16th.  How does it end up in rc1 on
July 9th?  6.4 was June 25th.  9 days is long enough for something
that's not an urgent fix to land in rc1?  Networking doesn't close
development at rc5/6 like most subsystem trees?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux