Re: RFC: O_PONIES semantics (well O_REWRITE)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust wrote:

How is this any different than just having your application use
mkostemp() to create a temporary dot file, then renaming it when done
writing?

That is exactly what it is.  There are reasons for implementing
it at a lower level in the system, though.

Implementing it in glibc:
- means applications get it right (today, many don't)
- allows for a performance optimization, moving the fsync
  into a specially spawned off temporary thread, so the
  main application doesn't stall

Implementing it in the kernel allows for some further
performance and power optimizations, most notably:
- the sync could be turned into an ordering requirement,
  meaning it can be postponed and even obsoleted by a
  future version of the file
- the ability to postpone the write allows for better
  power saving

--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux