On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 17:07, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > That is, do we want SIGWINCH or SIGALRM to result in a short read?
>
> Now, that's a different issue, and is actually handled by the signal
> layer: a signal that is ignored (where "ignored" includes the case of
> "default handler") will be dropped early, exactly because we don't
> want to interrupt things like tty or pipe reads when you resize the
> window.
In case you care, it's prepare_signal() -> sig_ignored() ->
sig_task_ignored() -> sig_handler_ignored() logic that does this
short-circuiting.
And while I don't think it's required by POSIX, this was definitely a
case where lots of programs that *don't* use any signal handlers at
all are very much not expecting to see -EINTR as a return value, and
used to break exactly on things like SIGWINCH when reading from a tty
or a pipe.
But that logic goes back to before linux-1.0.
In fact, I think it goes back to at least 0.99.10 (June '93).
Linus
