On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:46, Jeff Layton wrote: > In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is > used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of > inode->i_ctime. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > fs/vboxsf/utils.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/vboxsf/utils.c b/fs/vboxsf/utils.c > index dd0ae1188e87..576b91d571c5 100644 > --- a/fs/vboxsf/utils.c > +++ b/fs/vboxsf/utils.c > @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ int vboxsf_init_inode(struct vboxsf_sbi *sbi, struct inode *inode, > > inode->i_atime = ns_to_timespec64( > info->access_time.ns_relative_to_unix_epoch); > - inode->i_ctime = ns_to_timespec64( > - info->change_time.ns_relative_to_unix_epoch); > + inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, > + ns_to_timespec64(info->change_time.ns_relative_to_unix_epoch)); > inode->i_mtime = ns_to_timespec64( > info->modification_time.ns_relative_to_unix_epoch); > return 0; > -- > 2.41.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
