On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 15:01:42 -0400
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
> used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/tracefs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/inode.c b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> index 57ac8aa4a724..2feb6c58648c 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static struct inode *tracefs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> struct inode *inode = new_inode(sb);
> if (inode) {
> inode->i_ino = get_next_ino();
> - inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
> + inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
> }
> return inode;
> }
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-- Steve
